When it comes to verifying the safety, strength, and leak-tightness of water utility pipelines, thorough testing is essential. In the UK, hydrostatic and pneumatic testing are two primary methods used by water utilities, each offering unique benefits based on the type of pipeline, environmental factors, and project requirements. Here, we explore these two approaches to help you choose the best testing method for your project. We’re equipped to support your testing needs with industry-compliant procedures and expert insights.
Contact Us
Understanding Hydrostatic Testing
Hydrostatic testing, the most widely used method for testing water utility pipelines, involves filling the pipe with water, pressurising it to a specified level, and monitoring for leaks, deformations, or structural weaknesses. This method is often preferred for water systems because it presents fewer risks, as water stores less energy compared to compressed air.
Key Benefits of Hydrostatic Testing:
Reduces risk, as water, unlike compressed air, doesn’t compress significantly and releases energy more gradually.
Ideal for revealing even small leaks or weaknesses in pipes.
Lower stored energy during testing makes it safer for operators.
Meets guidelines from Water UK and other industry regulations.
Common Applications in the UK: Hydrostatic testing is commonly used in:
Ensures the integrity of newly installed water mains and service pipelines.
Verifies the strength and leak-tightness of pipelines following significant repairs or replacements.
Confirms the condition of storage facilities for water utilities.
Used to check the structural soundness of the distribution network periodically.
We perform hydrostatic testing as a standard for all new water main installations and major repairs to maintain the reliability and safety of the water supply system.
Exploring Pneumatic Testing
While hydrostatic testing is the standard choice for water pipelines, pneumatic testing is occasionally used in certain scenarios, particularly when water is difficult to access, or the system is sensitive to moisture. Pneumatic testing pressurises the pipeline with compressed air and is typically faster to set up, though it comes with higher risks due to the energy stored in compressed gas.
Key Benefits of Pneumatic Testing:
Suitable for pipelines where introducing water could create issues, such as in some temporary or smaller installations.
Often faster to conduct than hydrostatic testing, making it useful in situations requiring rapid assessments.
Useful for testing air valves and small-diameter pipes in hard-to-access areas.
Common Applications in the UK: Although less common in water utilities, pneumatic testing may be appropriate for:
Checks the functioning of air valves without adding water to the system.
Effective for locations where it’s difficult to bring in large volumes of water.
Situations where the installation is not permanent, and rapid testing is necessary.
Selecting the Right Testing Method for Your Project
Deciding between hydrostatic and pneumatic testing depends on several factors, each relevant to the unique needs of your water utility pipeline project. Below are the primary considerations to guide your choice:
Hydrostatic Testing: Typically recommended for most water distribution systems, following the Type 2 Pressure Decay Test as specified by Water UK’s IGN 4-01-03 guidelines.
Pneumatic Testing: Used in low-pressure systems or components where water introduction may cause problems.
Hydrostatic Testing: The standard for new installations.
Pneumatic Testing: Can be advantageous for existing systems containing sensitive equipment where the addition of water could cause issues.
Hydrostatic Testing: Used in typical conditions but may require antifreeze solutions if conducted in freezing temperatures.
Pneumatic Testing: Sometimes preferable when water is scarce or unavailable, or in locations where water removal is challenging.
Hydrostatic Testing: Required by the Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999 for underground pipelines with an external diameter of 63mm or more. Local authorities may specify additional requirements.
Pneumatic Testing: While not always required, it is regulated and may be specified for particular applications.
Hydrostatic Testing: Generally more cost-effective, as water is readily available.
Pneumatic Testing: May incur higher costs due to the need for compressed air equipment and potential additional safety measures.
UK Standards and Best Practices for Pipeline Testing
Water utilities in the UK operate under stringent guidelines to ensure uniform and effective testing practices. Adhering to these standards not only assures the quality of testing but also protects the public water supply:
This guideline details the Type 2 Pressure Decay Test for polyethylene (PE) pipes, which includes pressurising to the system test pressure, followed by a period of monitoring and pressure decay analysis. This procedure is standard for new mains and significant repairs.
This regulation mandates hydrostatic testing for specified underground pipelines to ensure proper functionality and safety.
Additional standards set by the Water Regulations Advisory Scheme (WRAS) outline requirements for materials and fittings in water systems.
Hydrostatic Testing for Polyethylene Pipes
For PE pipes, the standard hydrostatic testing procedure generally involves:
The pipe is pressurised to 1.5 times its design working pressure.
Observing the pipe for leaks or signs of creep (expansion of the pipe).
Pressure is monitored for a specified time to identify any inconsistencies.